Monday 12 December 2011
Sunday 11 December 2011
Rakyat perlu terus sokong BN: Tun Mahathir
KUALA LUMPUR: Rakyat perlu terus menyokong kerajaan Barisan Nasional (BN) kerana terbukti ia mampu memenuhi keperluan rakyat, kata bekas Perdana Menteri, Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad.
Beliau berkata, kerajaan BN memperjuangkan nasib rakyat tanpa mengira kaum sejak dari zaman selepas merdeka lagi.
"Apa sebabnya kita nak tukar kepada parti lain? Ada orang suruh tukar sebab kononnya BN ini jahat, pencuri, penyangak, korupsi dan sebagainya tetapi mereka (parti lain) belum diuji macam kita (BN).
"Ada pepatah Inggeris kata, kita jangan sesekali cuba baiki sesuatu perkara yang sudah berjalan dengan baik kerana kalau salah baiki, nanti lain jadinya. Begitu juga dengan sokongan kepada BN... dasar pemerintahan BN yang seimbang untuk semua kaum dilihat sudah cukup baik.
"Jadi tidak perlulah tukar kepada kerajaan yang belum tentu lagi mampu membela nasib rakyat," katanya ketika berucap pada Majlis Bicara Negarawan bersama Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad dengan Umno bahagian Ampang di Dewan Datuk Setia Mufti Suib, hari ini.
Dr Mahathir berkata, rakyat perlu memberi sokongan berterusan kepada BN kerana ia dapat membantu dalam membentuk sebuah kerajaan yang kuat dan mampu berkhidmat demi kebaikan seluruh rakyat serta membina negara yang berjaya.
Sementara itu, ketika diminta mengulas cadangan kerajaan untuk meminda Akta Universiti dan Kolej Universiti (AUKU) 1974, beliau berkata akta itu diwujudkan demi menjaga kepentingan pelajar Melayu.
"Pada zaman itu, lebih ramai pelajar Melayu yang aktif berpolitik berbanding kaum lain. Akta itu diwujudkan bagi memastikan mereka menumpukan sepenuh perhatian terhadap pelajaran dan seterusnya berjaya.
"Orang Melayu, sudahlah tidak ramai yang terpelajar, bila masuk universiti sibuk berpolitik pula, bila masa nak belajar? Saya sendiri aktif berpolitik masa muda dulu, tapi apabila melanjutkan pelajaran, saya tinggalkan dunia politik hampir enam tahun dan belajar saja," katanya.
Pada 24 November lalu, Perdana Menteri Datuk Seri Najib Abdul Razak mengumumkan di Dewan Rakyat bahawa kerajaan akan meminda AUKU bagi membenarkan mahasiswa menjadi anggota parti politik. - BERNAMA
Sumber: http://www.bharian.com.my/bharian/articles/RakyatperluterussokongBN_TunMahathir/Article
Beliau berkata, kerajaan BN memperjuangkan nasib rakyat tanpa mengira kaum sejak dari zaman selepas merdeka lagi.
"Apa sebabnya kita nak tukar kepada parti lain? Ada orang suruh tukar sebab kononnya BN ini jahat, pencuri, penyangak, korupsi dan sebagainya tetapi mereka (parti lain) belum diuji macam kita (BN).
"Jadi tidak perlulah tukar kepada kerajaan yang belum tentu lagi mampu membela nasib rakyat," katanya ketika berucap pada Majlis Bicara Negarawan bersama Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad dengan Umno bahagian Ampang di Dewan Datuk Setia Mufti Suib, hari ini.
Dr Mahathir berkata, rakyat perlu memberi sokongan berterusan kepada BN kerana ia dapat membantu dalam membentuk sebuah kerajaan yang kuat dan mampu berkhidmat demi kebaikan seluruh rakyat serta membina negara yang berjaya.
Sementara itu, ketika diminta mengulas cadangan kerajaan untuk meminda Akta Universiti dan Kolej Universiti (AUKU) 1974, beliau berkata akta itu diwujudkan demi menjaga kepentingan pelajar Melayu.
"Pada zaman itu, lebih ramai pelajar Melayu yang aktif berpolitik berbanding kaum lain. Akta itu diwujudkan bagi memastikan mereka menumpukan sepenuh perhatian terhadap pelajaran dan seterusnya berjaya.
"Orang Melayu, sudahlah tidak ramai yang terpelajar, bila masuk universiti sibuk berpolitik pula, bila masa nak belajar? Saya sendiri aktif berpolitik masa muda dulu, tapi apabila melanjutkan pelajaran, saya tinggalkan dunia politik hampir enam tahun dan belajar saja," katanya.
Pada 24 November lalu, Perdana Menteri Datuk Seri Najib Abdul Razak mengumumkan di Dewan Rakyat bahawa kerajaan akan meminda AUKU bagi membenarkan mahasiswa menjadi anggota parti politik. - BERNAMA
Sumber: http://www.bharian.com.my/bharian/articles/RakyatperluterussokongBN_TunMahathir/Article
Sunday 16 October 2011
Enggan minta maaf tindakan 'kurang ajar': Tun Dr Mahathir
SERI ISKANDAR: Bekas Perdana Menteri, Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad menyifatkan keengganan Profesor Dr Abdul Aziz Bari memohon maaf serta menarik balik kenyataannya yang mempertikai titah Sultan Selangor berhubung isu pemeriksaan gereja di Damansara Utama Ogos lalu, 'sebagai kurang ajar'.
Beliau berkata kenyataan pensyarah undang-undang Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Malaysia (UIAM) itu bertentangan dengan moral masyarakat Timur dan boleh disifatkan sebagai kurang ajar dalam bahasa Melayu.
"Sama ada ia melanggar undang-undang, saya tidak tahu, tetapi dari segi moral, ia kurang ajar," katanya kepada pemberita selepas menyempurnakan Majlis Konvokesyen Universiti Teknologi Petronas (UTP) Ke-11 hari ini. Dr Mahathir, yang juga Canselor UTP, diminta mengulas kenyataan Dr Abdul Aziz yang disiarkan sebuah portal berita bahawa tindakan Sultan Selangor campur tangan berhubung isu pemeriksaan gereja bukan sesuatu tindakan yang lazim.
Abdul Aziz dilaporkan berkata sebagai Ketua Agama Islam di Selangor, Sultan Sharafuddin Idris Shah berhak campur tangan, namun ia perlu dilakukan selaras dengan ajaran Islam.
Terdahulu, Dr Mahathir menyampaikan Anugerah Canselor Emas kepada graduan Sarjana Muda Kepujian Kejuruteraan Awam Lai Chin Leong, 23, berikutan kecemerlangannya meraih purata nilai gred kumulatif (PNGK) 3.89.
Muhammad Aiman Jamaludin, 22, T. Kuhanesapathy, 23, pula menerima Anugerah Canselor Perak dan Gangsa. - BERNAMA
Sumber: http://www.bharian.com.my/bharian/articles/Engganmintamaaftindakan_kurangajar__TunDrMahathir/Article
Beliau berkata kenyataan pensyarah undang-undang Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Malaysia (UIAM) itu bertentangan dengan moral masyarakat Timur dan boleh disifatkan sebagai kurang ajar dalam bahasa Melayu.
Abdul Aziz dilaporkan berkata sebagai Ketua Agama Islam di Selangor, Sultan Sharafuddin Idris Shah berhak campur tangan, namun ia perlu dilakukan selaras dengan ajaran Islam.
Terdahulu, Dr Mahathir menyampaikan Anugerah Canselor Emas kepada graduan Sarjana Muda Kepujian Kejuruteraan Awam Lai Chin Leong, 23, berikutan kecemerlangannya meraih purata nilai gred kumulatif (PNGK) 3.89.
Muhammad Aiman Jamaludin, 22, T. Kuhanesapathy, 23, pula menerima Anugerah Canselor Perak dan Gangsa. - BERNAMA
Sumber: http://www.bharian.com.my/bharian/articles/Engganmintamaaftindakan_kurangajar__TunDrMahathir/Article
Friday 16 September 2011
‘Saya tidak boleh terima nasihat itu’
SHAH ALAM - Bekas Perdana Menteri Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad mengaku, beliau tetap memecat timbalannya, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, walaupun dinasihatkan tidak berbuat demikian oleh Mufti Perak, Tan Sri Harussani Zakaria.
Menurutnya, tindakan itu dilakukan kerana beliau tidak boleh menerima seseorang yang tidak bermoral menjadi pemimpin dalam kabinetnya.
“Sekiranya beliau (Harussani) menasihatkan saya, saya akan menafikan perkara tersebut, kerana saya tidak boleh menerima nasihat seperti itu,” katanya dalam entri terbaru blognya www.chedet.cc, semalam.
Harussani mendedahkan beliau pernah cuba bertemu dengan Dr Mahathir untuk meminta tidak memecat dan mengenakan tuduhan liwat ke atas Anwar.
Beliau tidak dibenarkan menemui perdana menteri ketika itu kerana Dr Mahathir enggan menemuinya.
Harussani berkata demikian dalam Wancana Sinar Harian Siri 6, bertajuk Ulama Politik, Untuk Dakwah atau Parti di Auditorium Kompleks Kumpulan Media Karangkraf, pada 24 Ogos lalu.
Dalam wacana itu, Harussani berkata, banyak perkara beliau cadangkan kepada Dr Mahathir, termasuk tidak memecat Anwar, bagi mengelakkan perpecahan Melayu.
“Jika pecat Anwar, pengaruh (Anwar) bukan sikit; boleh pecah Melayu. Begitu juga tuduhan liwat; perlu ada empat saksi. Saya mahu cadangkan supaya buat rombakan Kabinet sahaja, turunkan Anwar dari timbalan perdana menteri kepada menteri biasa. Itu yang lebih baik,” katanya.
Anwar dipecat daripada jawatan Timbalan Perdana Menteri dan juga Timbalan Presiden Umno, pada September 1998.
Dr Mahathir berkata, beliau sendiri tidak mengingati sama ada Harussani hendak memberi nasihat itu di majlis awam atau secara peribadi.:
“Saya menggugurkan Anwar kerana tiada pilihan. Ini disebabkan sikap tidak bermoralnya; bagaimana saya boleh menjelaskan kepada rakyat...,” katanya.
Dr Mahathir berkata, pelbagai pihak, termasuk penyokong Anwar, mengatakan tindakan itu bermotifkan politik, tetapi hakikatnya adalah berbeza.:
Anwar menafikan tuduhan melibatkan moral yang dilemparkan kepadanya.
Dalam tahun 1999, Anwar dijatuhi hukuman penjara selama enam tahun kerana didapati bersalah di atas kesalahan penyalahgunaan kuasa.
Pada tahun 2000, hukuman selama sembilan tahun dikenakan kerana didakwa melakukan kesalahan di luar tabii (liwat).
Walau bagaimanapun, pada tahun 2004, Mahkamah Persekutuan menggugurkan sabitan kesalahan liwat kerana pihak pendakwa raya gagal mengemukakan bukti kukuh tanpa sebarang keraguan, bahawa perbuatan meliwat tersebut telah berlaku. Oleh itu beliau dibebaskan.
Thursday 18 August 2011
Program Duit Raya Termudah - Chedet-co-cc.blogspot
Salam..
Kawan-kawan yang saya hormati sekalian.. Apa khabar?
Ini Barulah Betul-Betul Mudah Nak Jana RM!
Saya telah menemui satu program terbaru yang sangat mudah untuk jana RM..
Tak perlu saya terang panjang lebar.. Saudara saudari boleh lihat di laman web ini.
Sekarang Dah Puasa.. Hari Raya Bakal Menjelang!
Apa kata kita try jana RM5000 bulan ini? Lagi cepat bermula, lagi banyak dijana!
Jom daftar:
Gempar! Google keluarkan semua Domain Co.cc dari senarai Index Search Engine
Berita gempar! Malang bagi semua pengguna subdomain Co.cc apabila Google mengambil keputusan untuk mengeluarkan semua entri subdomain berkenaan dari Senarai index Search Engine Google. Punca sebenarnya tidaklah pula diketahui tapi banyak berkait rapat dengan aktiviti spammers yang ramai telah menyalahgunakan kelebihan yang ada pada pengguna subdomain berkenaan.
Berikut adalah kenyataan Matt Cutts dalam Google+ berkenaan isu berkenaan :-
Sumber asal : http://eiz1004.upprofits.com/google-keluarkan-semua-domain-co-cc-dari-senarai-index-search-engine/#ixzz1VNyUDR1u
Hanya disebabkan banyak aktiviti Fraction yang menjadi punca spammers dan link berkualiti rendah dari pengguna subdomain berkenaan, maka keseluruhan domain berkenaan menjadi mangsa. Kebanyakan mereka juga menggunakan Auto Generate Contents atau AGC untuk meningkatkan trafik laman web / blog mereka tanpa perlu bersusah payah. Tindakan tegas Google ini banyak berkait rapat dengan polisi mereka.. http://googleonlinesecurity.blogspot.com/2011/06/protecting-users-from-malware-hosted-on.html ..
Pencarian laman Co.cc melalui Seacrh Engine Google tidak menemukan satu pun laman yang terindeks termasuklah laman blog mantan PM kita, Tun Dr M (http://chedet.co.cc/ ). Namun, pengguna domain Co.cc masih boleh menggunakan subdomain berkenaan seperti biasa cuma mereka hanya boleh berharap agar Google mengubah keputusan mereka yang tidak mengindeks domain berkenaan.
p/s – Kerana Nila Setitik, Rosak Susu Sebelanga..
Tuesday 3 May 2011
Blog Chedet Diserang Malware
Untuk rakan-rakan yang meminati blog Chedet, dibawah ini adalah status laman web Chedet.co.cc yang dikatakan telah diserang Malware dan "Reported Web Forgery!"
Antara artikel mengenai serangan ini adalah di:
http://www.bharian.com.my/bharian/articles/BlogChedetdiserang/Article
http://www.hmetro.com.my/articles/chedet_diserangmalware/Article
Bersama kita menyokong mantan Perdana Menteri Malaysia kita. Google! Cepatlah selesaikan masalah ini untuk kami!
Bagi yang sukar untuk membaca entry terbaru dari blog asal Chedet.co.cc dibawah ini dilampirkan penulisan oleh blog chedet.co.cc untuk memudahkan anda ya:
Antara artikel mengenai serangan ini adalah di:
http://www.bharian.com.my/bharian/articles/BlogChedetdiserang/Article
http://www.hmetro.com.my/articles/chedet_diserangmalware/Article
Bersama kita menyokong mantan Perdana Menteri Malaysia kita. Google! Cepatlah selesaikan masalah ini untuk kami!
Bagi yang sukar untuk membaca entry terbaru dari blog asal Chedet.co.cc dibawah ini dilampirkan penulisan oleh blog chedet.co.cc untuk memudahkan anda ya:
1. What does the ordinary man imagine a no-fly zone is about? I believe he would imagine a sky without any planes flying. At most he would expect to see only military aircrafts of the enforcing nations flying over the zone to ensure the aircrafts of the targeted country are not flying over the zone.
2. In the case of the Iraqi no-fly zone, the enforcing nations apparently believed that "no-fly zone" is about blockading the zone to deprive it from receiving supplies of all kinds including food and medicine. As a result an estimated 500,000 Iraqi children were born deformed or were still-born due to the affect of bombs and shells with depleted uranium used in the Gulf War against Iraq.
3. Now once again a "no-fly zone" has been declared over Libya, this time by the United Nations. The Arab countries have also supported this resolution.
2. In the case of the Iraqi no-fly zone, the enforcing nations apparently believed that "no-fly zone" is about blockading the zone to deprive it from receiving supplies of all kinds including food and medicine. As a result an estimated 500,000 Iraqi children were born deformed or were still-born due to the affect of bombs and shells with depleted uranium used in the Gulf War against Iraq.
3. Now once again a "no-fly zone" has been declared over Libya, this time by the United Nations. The Arab countries have also supported this resolution.
Continue reading NO FLY ZONE.
1. Every time I mention DAP's racism, the hackneyed rebuttal is that UMNO is a racial party, more than DAP.
2. UMNO, MCA and MIC are racial parties but they contest elections not under their own party names but as the Alliance or BN coalition. As a member of a multi-racial coalition they cannot promote only Malay, Chinese or Indian interests. They have coalesced into one political entity and their struggle is for all the races in that entity. The race based parties working together in the interest of members of all races lose their racial character.
3. The DAP, like the PAP, claims to be multi-racial but everyone knows the overwhelming majority of their members, supporters and their leaders are Chinese. And their struggle is principally against anything Malay and for what they claim to be Chinese rights. Their disguise that they are for Malaysians is exactly that - it is a disguise. No one is taken in by their claim to be multiracial.
2. UMNO, MCA and MIC are racial parties but they contest elections not under their own party names but as the Alliance or BN coalition. As a member of a multi-racial coalition they cannot promote only Malay, Chinese or Indian interests. They have coalesced into one political entity and their struggle is for all the races in that entity. The race based parties working together in the interest of members of all races lose their racial character.
3. The DAP, like the PAP, claims to be multi-racial but everyone knows the overwhelming majority of their members, supporters and their leaders are Chinese. And their struggle is principally against anything Malay and for what they claim to be Chinese rights. Their disguise that they are for Malaysians is exactly that - it is a disguise. No one is taken in by their claim to be multiracial.
Continue reading VICTORY IN SARAWAK 2.
1. I would like to congratulate Tan Sri Abdul Taib Mahmud, the chairman of Barisan Nasional in Sarawak for the victory achieved by the party in the recent election.
2. Dato Seri Najib and Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin also deserves to be congratulated. The two were on the ground campaigning almost throughout the whole campaign period. They worked very hard and they had good supporting staff from the Peninsular as well as Sarawak.
3. I congratulate the DAP for bringing its racist politics to Sarawak. Before this all races co-operated well with each other for the good of Sarawak. Now we see clearly that the Chinese community in Sarawak has rejected multi-racialism.
2. Dato Seri Najib and Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin also deserves to be congratulated. The two were on the ground campaigning almost throughout the whole campaign period. They worked very hard and they had good supporting staff from the Peninsular as well as Sarawak.
3. I congratulate the DAP for bringing its racist politics to Sarawak. Before this all races co-operated well with each other for the good of Sarawak. Now we see clearly that the Chinese community in Sarawak has rejected multi-racialism.
Continue reading VICTORY IN SARAWAK.
1. We hear a lot about litigation these days. Everyone is suing everyone else for hundreds of millions of Ringgit for alleged libel. Almost all the litigants are politicians. The courts' time is taken up with these cases. Some go on for years as the litigants appeal to higher and higher courts.
2. We hardly ever hear any of these litigations ending with the courts awarding the sum claimed by the complainants. In most cased the complainant would lose the case and ordered to pay cost.
3. The public usually do not have a high regard for these litigants. The disparaging utterances against them would not damage their reputation at all. Maybe justice demands that the whole legal process be gone through and a judgment be made by a court and the appeals be heard. But on the other hand, in some instances in order not to waste the time of the courts, the case may be curtly dismissed, and appeals disallowed. One wonders why there is this extreme disparity in the treatment of these cases.
2. We hardly ever hear any of these litigations ending with the courts awarding the sum claimed by the complainants. In most cased the complainant would lose the case and ordered to pay cost.
3. The public usually do not have a high regard for these litigants. The disparaging utterances against them would not damage their reputation at all. Maybe justice demands that the whole legal process be gone through and a judgment be made by a court and the appeals be heard. But on the other hand, in some instances in order not to waste the time of the courts, the case may be curtly dismissed, and appeals disallowed. One wonders why there is this extreme disparity in the treatment of these cases.
Continue reading POLITICAL LITIGATION.
1. The concept of globalisation; of a world without borders; of unrestricted movements of capital, goods and investments across borders was promoted during the late 80's and early 90's when the world economy seemed set to grow forever.
2. The growth would be even greater if the poor but resource-rich countries would abolish the restriction on the movement of foreign capital to exploit opportunities presented by them. In addition to the opportunities there was cheap labour to help reduce cost.
3. The poor countries would also gain from globalisation as foreign capital invested in the extraction of raw material and simple components manufacturing would create jobs and increase the income of the people and the revenues collected by Government. Globalisation would seem to benefit everyone, the rich foreign investors and traders and people in poor countries.
2. The growth would be even greater if the poor but resource-rich countries would abolish the restriction on the movement of foreign capital to exploit opportunities presented by them. In addition to the opportunities there was cheap labour to help reduce cost.
3. The poor countries would also gain from globalisation as foreign capital invested in the extraction of raw material and simple components manufacturing would create jobs and increase the income of the people and the revenues collected by Government. Globalisation would seem to benefit everyone, the rich foreign investors and traders and people in poor countries.
Continue reading GLOBALISATION.
1. Recently someone complained that Malaysians have to pay high prices for cars because the Government is protecting Proton.
2. Actually the high price for imported cars was fixed before Proton to reduce gas-guzzling cars from being imported. Thus cars with big engines are taxed (import duty) by 300%. Other cars are also heavily taxed to reduce import of petrol.
3. When Proton was introduced the price fixed was lower due to lower tax being charged. The buyers profited from the lower price so that those who could not buy a car before could now buy a Proton car.
2. Actually the high price for imported cars was fixed before Proton to reduce gas-guzzling cars from being imported. Thus cars with big engines are taxed (import duty) by 300%. Other cars are also heavily taxed to reduce import of petrol.
3. When Proton was introduced the price fixed was lower due to lower tax being charged. The buyers profited from the lower price so that those who could not buy a car before could now buy a Proton car.
Continue reading PROTECTIONISM .
1. I had often wondered why university towns like Cambridge and Oxford do not develop in Malaysia after we build universities in places far from the towns.
2. After much study and thinking things over I have concluded that it is because universities, particularly Government universities, build all the shops within the campus and probably operate them as well. The residences for the students and staff are all built by the University.
3. Developers find no opportunity for developing the surrounding land through building shops and residences for staff and students. There will only be university campuses and no university towns.
2. After much study and thinking things over I have concluded that it is because universities, particularly Government universities, build all the shops within the campus and probably operate them as well. The residences for the students and staff are all built by the University.
3. Developers find no opportunity for developing the surrounding land through building shops and residences for staff and students. There will only be university campuses and no university towns.
Continue reading UNIVERSITY TOWNS.
1. Saya sedih. Saya amat sedih apabila mendengar seorang orang Melayu yang mendakwa dia kecewa kerana dianya dilahir berbangsa Melayu.
2. Kekecewaannya disebabkan dia tidak dilahir hanya sebagai orang Islam.
3. Sesungguhnya tidak ada manusia yang dilahir tidak berbangsa. Mungkin ada yang tidak bernegara (stateless) tetapi mereka juga mempunyai bangsa, walaupun tidak diiktiraf oleh negara mereka sendiri. Jika dianya daripada kaum pendatang maka dianya akan menjadi bangsa kaum pendatang.
2. Kekecewaannya disebabkan dia tidak dilahir hanya sebagai orang Islam.
3. Sesungguhnya tidak ada manusia yang dilahir tidak berbangsa. Mungkin ada yang tidak bernegara (stateless) tetapi mereka juga mempunyai bangsa, walaupun tidak diiktiraf oleh negara mereka sendiri. Jika dianya daripada kaum pendatang maka dianya akan menjadi bangsa kaum pendatang.
Continue reading MELAYU OH MELAYU.
1. I read an advertisement in a Malaysian paper by a Malaysian Steel mill wanting to buy iron ore. I also know of another steel mill importing iron ore.
2. I think this is very strange. It is known that iron ore is being mined in Terengganu and Pahang right now. I understand that the iron ore is being exported. Without being processed in any order to add value.
3. Why cannot the people mining for iron ore in Malaysia sell the ore to Malaysian mills. The ore they have to buy comes from Australia or even Latin America. The price must be higher because of transportation cost. If Malaysian ore is sold to Malaysian mills, the profit would be higher for the miners as the transportation cost would be lower.
2. I think this is very strange. It is known that iron ore is being mined in Terengganu and Pahang right now. I understand that the iron ore is being exported. Without being processed in any order to add value.
3. Why cannot the people mining for iron ore in Malaysia sell the ore to Malaysian mills. The ore they have to buy comes from Australia or even Latin America. The price must be higher because of transportation cost. If Malaysian ore is sold to Malaysian mills, the profit would be higher for the miners as the transportation cost would be lower.
Continue reading IRON ORE.
1. Someone asked what about the "Orang Asli" literally the "Original People". Weren't they in the peninsular before the Malays?
2. They could be. So are the Red Indians, the Maoris, the aborigines of Australia, the many tribal people in many countries of the world.
3. If we consider that the Orang Asli have more rights to claim Malaysia as their own then we should acknowledge and respect the rights of the Red Indians, the Maoris, the Australian aborigines and all the other aborigines to be given back the land we now call America, Australia, New Zealand etc.
2. They could be. So are the Red Indians, the Maoris, the aborigines of Australia, the many tribal people in many countries of the world.
3. If we consider that the Orang Asli have more rights to claim Malaysia as their own then we should acknowledge and respect the rights of the Red Indians, the Maoris, the Australian aborigines and all the other aborigines to be given back the land we now call America, Australia, New Zealand etc.
Continue reading SEMENANJUNG TANAH MELAYU 2.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
